Two-Gene Cross Calculators
0 calculators tagged with “Two-Gene Cross”
All Calculators
No calculators found for this topic.
Dihybrid Cross Setup
Parents: AaBb × AaBb. Gametes (each parent): AB, Ab, aB, ab — each at 1/4 frequency. 4×4 Punnett square → 16 genotype combinations → group by phenotype.
9:3:3:1 Phenotype Ratio
A_B_ (both dominant): 9/16. A_bb (A dominant, b recessive): 3/16. aaB_ (a recessive, B dominant): 3/16. aabb (both recessive): 1/16. Probability shortcut: multiply single-gene probabilities. P(A_B_) = 3/4 × 3/4 = 9/16; P(A_bb) = 3/4 × 1/4 = 3/16; etc.
Modified Ratios from Epistasis
- Dominant epistasis: 12:3:1 (A_ masks B)
- Recessive epistasis: 9:3:4 (aa masks B)
- Duplicate dominant: 15:1 (A_ or B_ → same phenotype)
- Complementary: 9:7 (A and B both needed)
Chi-Square Test
Test observed ratio against 9:3:3:1: χ² = Σ(O−E)²/E; df = 3. Critical χ² (df=3, p=0.05) = 7.815. If χ² > 7.815: reject 9:3:3:1 → investigate alternative ratios.
Glossary
Frequently Asked Questions
A dihybrid cross follows two independently assorting gene loci simultaneously. Standard cross: AaBb × AaBb. Each parent produces 4 gamete types: AB, Ab, aB, ab (each 1/4). The 4×4 Punnett square gives 16 combinations → grouped by phenotype: A_B_ (any A dominant, any B dominant): 9/16. A_bb: 3/16. aaB_: 3/16. aabb: 1/16. Ratio: 9:3:3:1. This requires: both genes show complete dominance; genes are on different chromosomes (or far apart on the same one) → independent assortment (Mendel's second law).
The product rule: for independently assorting genes, the probability of a combined outcome = product of individual probabilities. From a monohybrid Aa × Aa cross: P(A_) = 3/4; P(aa) = 1/4. For two genes: P(A_B_) = P(A_) × P(B_) = 3/4 × 3/4 = 9/16. P(A_bb) = P(A_) × P(bb) = 3/4 × 1/4 = 3/16. P(aaB_) = 1/4 × 3/4 = 3/16. P(aabb) = 1/4 × 1/4 = 1/16. This avoids drawing the full 16-cell Punnett square and is faster for exam problems. Always verify: 9/16 + 3/16 + 3/16 + 1/16 = 16/16 = 1 ✓.
Modified ratios arise when the two genes interact (epistasis): Dominant epistasis (12:3:1): presence of A_ masks effect of B. Example: A_ produces yellow pigment regardless of B; aaB_ = purple; aabb = white. Recessive epistasis (9:3:4): aa genotype masks B expression. Example: aa prevents pigment production; B has no color to express → aaB_ and aabb both look the same (no color). Complementary genes (9:7): both A and B required for phenotype. Neither alone is sufficient. Duplicate dominant (15:1): A_ or B_ alone is sufficient → only aabb shows recessive phenotype. All modified ratios still total 16 cells; they are different groupings of the 9:3:3:1 genotype classes.
Chi-square goodness of fit test: H₀ = ratio is 9:3:3:1 (independent assortment, complete dominance). For total n offspring: Expected counts: E(A_B_) = n × 9/16; E(A_bb) = n × 3/16; E(aaB_) = n × 3/16; E(aabb) = n × 1/16. Calculate: χ² = Σ(O−E)²/E for all 4 classes. Degrees of freedom = 4 − 1 = 3. Critical value: χ² (df=3, p=0.05) = 7.815. Decision: χ² < 7.815 → data consistent with 9:3:3:1; χ² > 7.815 → significantly different → investigate alternative ratios (epistasis, linkage, or non-Mendelian inheritance).