Mark-Recapture Calculators
0 calculators tagged with “Mark-Recapture”
All Calculators
No calculators found for this topic.
Lincoln-Petersen Formula
N̂ = (M × C) / R
M = marked and released; C = total in second capture; R = marked in second capture. Example: tag 50 fish (M=50); recapture 40 (C=40); 8 tagged (R=8): N̂ = (50×40)/8 = 250 fish. Chapman modified estimator for small samples: N̂ = [(M+1)(C+1)/(R+1)] − 1.
Assumptions and Violations
- Closed population: no births, deaths, immigration between samples
- Equal catchability: marked and unmarked equally catchable — violations cause over/underestimates
- Random mixing: marked animals don't have different habitat use from unmarked
- Mark retention: tags must not fall off or increase mortality
Modern Methods
MARK program: CJS (open populations); Huggins models (heterogeneous detection). Genetic mark-recapture: DNA fingerprinting as non-invasive marks for wolves, bears, whales.
Glossary
Frequently Asked Questions
Mark-recapture captures, marks, and releases animals, then re-samples the population. The Lincoln-Petersen estimate: N̂ = MC/R. Logic: if marked animals mix randomly, the proportion marked in the second sample (R/C) equals the proportion marked in the whole population (M/N). Solve for N. Example: mark 60 deer (M); recapture 80 (C); 12 are marked (R): N̂ = 60×80/12 = 400 deer.
Four critical assumptions: (1) Closed population — no births, deaths, immigration, or emigration between samples. (2) Random mixing — marked animals distribute randomly among unmarked throughout the habitat. (3) Equal catchability — all animals have the same probability of being captured in the second sample; trap-happiness or trap-shyness violates this. (4) Mark persistence — marks must not fall off or cause higher mortality. Violations lead to biased estimates: trap-happy animals → R too high → N underestimated; trap-shy → R too low → N overestimated.
Mark-recapture guides: harvest management — fish and deer population estimates set catch limits and hunting quotas; survival estimation — recapture rates across multiple periods estimate annual survival (Cormack-Jolly-Seber models); population trend monitoring — compare N̂ between years to detect decline or recovery; dispersal mapping — track where marked individuals appear to estimate home ranges. Pacific salmon: coded wire tags or PIT tags in hatcheries; recover tags at dams and in commercial catch to estimate run size.
Instead of physical tags, each individual's DNA genotype serves as a unique, non-invasive mark. Collect DNA from hair snares, feces, shed skin, or biopsy darts; genotype to identify individuals. Advantages: no capture needed; no trap-related behavioral effects; works for elusive, dangerous, or hard-to-capture species (wolves, bears, marine mammals). Photo-identification is a similar approach using natural markings (whale flukes, shark fins, big cat spots). Software like Wildbook uses pattern-matching algorithms to automate individual recognition from photographs.