Irrigation Calculators
0 calculators tagged with “Irrigation”
All Calculators
No calculators found for this topic.
Irrigation Methods
- Surface (flood/furrow): Water flows over soil surface; simplest; efficiency 40–60%; best for flat fields with fine-textured soils
- Sprinkler: Water sprayed from nozzles; efficiency 65–85%; flexible for uneven terrain; evaporation and wind drift losses
- Drip/micro-irrigation: Water delivered to root zone through emitters; efficiency 85–95%; expensive to install but highly water-efficient; suitable for row crops, orchards, vineyards
- Subsurface drip (SDI): Emitters buried below soil surface; eliminates evaporation from soil; highest efficiency > 90%
Crop Water Requirement
ETc = ET₀ × Kc. ET₀ from FAO Penman-Monteith (weather data); Kc varies by crop and growth stage. Net irrigation = ETc − effective rainfall. Gross irrigation = net / irrigation efficiency.
Irrigation Scheduling
Soil moisture depletion method: irrigate when depletion reaches 50% of TAW (total available water = (FC − WP) × rooting depth). Continuous monitoring: soil moisture sensors (tensiometers, capacitance sensors) at plant root depth.
Glossary
Frequently Asked Questions
Surface irrigation: water applied at one end of a field and flows over the surface by gravity. Furrow: water in small channels between crop rows. Basin: flat areas flooded with water. Efficiency 40–60%. Least expensive to install but high water losses from deep percolation and runoff. Sprinkler: overhead nozzles spray water over fields. Center pivot: large rotating arm with nozzles covers circular field. Efficiency 65–85%. Higher capital cost; can be automated. Wind increases losses. Drip irrigation: water delivered directly to root zone through emitters at 0.5–2 L/hour. Efficiency 85–95%. Most efficient; highest capital cost; requires filtration to prevent clogging. Subsurface drip: emitters below soil surface → no evaporation from soil surface → efficiency > 90%; used in cotton, grain crops, vegetables.
Crop water requirement (ETc) = ET₀ × Kc. ET₀ = reference evapotranspiration from weather data (FAO Penman-Monteith equation). Kc = crop coefficient (varies by crop growth stage): initial stage Kc ≈ 0.3–0.4; mid-season Kc ≈ 1.0–1.25; late season Kc declines. Net irrigation requirement = ETc − effective rainfall (rainfall that enters the root zone). Gross irrigation = net / irrigation efficiency. Example: ETc = 6 mm/day; effective rainfall = 1 mm/day; drip irrigation (efficiency = 0.90): net = 5 mm/day; gross = 5/0.90 = 5.6 mm/day to apply. For a 10 ha field: volume = 5.6 mm × 10 ha × 10 m³/ha/mm = 560 m³/day.
Deficit irrigation deliberately applies water below full crop water requirements to: Save water in water-limited regions. Maintain yields while using significantly less water. Improve water productivity (yield per cubic meter of water). Strategic deficit approaches: Regulated deficit irrigation (RDI): deficit applied during specific growth stages when water stress has less impact on yield; full irrigation during critical stages. Partial root zone drying (PRD): alternates irrigation between two halves of the root zone; one side dries while the other is irrigated; roots in dry zone send ABA (abscisic acid) signals → stomatal partial closure → reduce transpiration without major photosynthesis reduction. Yield impact: 20–30% water reduction often causes only 5–10% yield reduction; water productivity (kg/m³) improves. Widely used in cotton, grapevines, stone fruit, and arid region cereals.
Drip irrigation achieves 85–95% application efficiency vs. 40–60% for flood/surface irrigation because: No runoff: water delivered slowly at the root zone — not fast enough to run off. No deep percolation: low flow rate matches soil infiltration rate → water stays in the root zone. No evaporation from bare soil: water applied only where needed. No wind losses (unlike sprinkler). Water saving: shifting from flood to drip irrigation typically saves 30–50% of water for the same crop. Additional benefits: fertigation (fertilizers injected through drip → precise application to root zone); reduced weed growth (dry inter-row areas); reduced disease (no wet foliage); improved fruit quality in some crops. Challenges: higher installation cost ($1,000–3,000/ha for above-ground drip); requires filtration; emitter clogging risk; needs skilled management.