Epidemiology Calculators
0 calculators tagged with “Epidemiology”
All Calculators
No calculators found for this topic.
Disease Frequency Measures
- Incidence rate: New cases / person-time at risk. Measures the rate of new disease occurrence.
- Cumulative incidence: New cases / population at risk in a given period. Risk of developing disease.
- Prevalence: Existing cases / total population at a point in time or period. Proportion currently affected. Prevalence ≈ incidence × average disease duration.
Measures of Association
- Relative risk (RR): Incidence in exposed / incidence in unexposed. RR > 1 = increased risk; RR < 1 = protective.
- Odds ratio (OR): Odds of exposure in cases / odds of exposure in controls. Used in case-control studies. OR approximates RR when disease is rare.
- Attributable risk: Incidence_exposed − Incidence_unexposed. Excess risk attributable to exposure.
Study Designs
- Cohort: Follow exposed and unexposed groups; compare incidence; gold standard for RR; efficient for common exposures; prospective or retrospective
- Case-control: Compare exposures in cases vs. controls; efficient for rare diseases; calculates OR; susceptible to recall bias
- Cross-sectional: Exposure and outcome at one time; prevalence study; can't establish temporality
- RCT: Random assignment to exposure; controls confounding; highest evidence for causation
Confounding
Confounders are variables associated with both exposure and outcome (e.g., smoking as confounder in coffee-lung cancer studies). Control by: restriction; matching; stratification; multivariate regression; propensity scores.
Glossary
Frequently Asked Questions
Incidence: the rate or proportion of NEW cases of a disease occurring in a defined population over a specified time period. It measures the risk of developing disease. Two types: (1) Incidence rate = new cases / person-time at risk (e.g., 50 cases/1,000 person-years); (2) Cumulative incidence (risk) = new cases / population at risk in a period. Prevalence: the proportion of a population that HAS the disease at a given point in time (or period). Prevalence ≈ incidence × average disease duration. High prevalence can result from high incidence OR long disease duration. These measure different things: incidence for acute diseases and risk factors; prevalence for chronic disease burden planning.
Relative Risk (RR): incidence in exposed / incidence in unexposed. Requires knowing disease incidence in both groups → used in cohort studies. Interpretation: RR = 2.5 means exposed individuals are 2.5× more likely to develop disease. Odds Ratio (OR): (odds of exposure in cases) / (odds of exposure in controls). Used in case-control studies (where incidence can't be calculated because cases are selected). When disease is rare (<10% incidence): OR ≈ RR. When disease is common: OR overestimates RR (OR will be further from 1 than RR). OR is still used in logistic regression for common outcomes because of mathematical convenience — just be cautious interpreting magnitude as RR when outcome is common.
Observational studies: Cohort — follows exposed/unexposed groups prospectively or retrospectively; measures incidence and calculates RR; best for common exposures and rare diseases. Case-control — selects cases (with disease) and controls (without); compares past exposure history; calculates OR; efficient for rare diseases; susceptible to recall and selection bias. Cross-sectional — measures exposure and disease simultaneously; provides prevalence; fast and cheap; cannot determine temporal sequence. Ecological — compares rates across populations; susceptible to ecological fallacy. Experimental: Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) — randomly assigns treatment; controls confounding; highest level of evidence; not always feasible or ethical. Natural experiments: use policy changes or other non-random exposures that mimic randomization.
Confounding occurs when a third variable (confounder) is associated with both the exposure and the outcome, distorting the apparent relationship between them. Example: studies initially found coffee associated with lung cancer; smoking is the confounder — smokers drink more coffee AND get more lung cancer; controlling for smoking eliminates the coffee-cancer association. Criteria for a confounder: associated with the exposure; associated with the outcome; not on the causal pathway between them. Control methods: Restriction (study only non-smokers); Matching (match cases and controls on confounders); Stratified analysis (compare RR/OR within each stratum of the confounder); Multivariable regression (adjust for multiple confounders simultaneously); Propensity score methods.