Divergence Time Calculators
0 calculators tagged with “Divergence Time”
All Calculators
No calculators found for this topic.
Molecular Clock Principle
The molecular clock hypothesis proposes that DNA and protein sequences accumulate substitutions at a roughly constant rate over time. Rate for neutral substitutions ≈ mutation rate μ. For non-neutral sites, purifying selection slows the rate. Under a strict molecular clock: divergence time T = d / (2r), where d = genetic distance between two sequences and r = substitution rate per site per year.
Calibrating the Molecular Clock
Fossil calibrations set minimum age bounds: if a fossil is clearly assigned to one side of a split, the divergence must predate the fossil. Biogeographic calibrations use known geological events (continental drift, land bridge formation) as time constraints. Multiple calibration points across the tree increase precision. Without calibration, only relative divergence times (which split came first) can be determined.
Bayesian Divergence Time Estimation
Programs like BEAST2, MCMCtree, and PhyloBayes use Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to jointly estimate phylogeny, branch lengths, and divergence times under relaxed clock models (where rates vary between lineages). Output: posterior probability distributions of node ages (usually shown as 95% highest posterior density intervals, HPD). Results are reported as e.g., 'the primate-rodent split was 87 Mya (95% HPD: 80–95 Mya)'.
Notable Divergence Times
- Human-chimpanzee: ~6–7 Mya
- Human-gorilla: ~8–9 Mya
- Bird-crocodile (archosaur divergence): ~240 Mya
- Animal-fungi divergence: ~1,000 Mya
Glossary
Frequently Asked Questions
Divergence time is when two lineages last shared a common ancestor. It is estimated using the molecular clock: T = d / (2r), where d is the genetic distance between two sequences and r is the substitution rate per site per year. The rate is calibrated using fossil records (minimum age constraints) or biogeographic events. Modern methods use Bayesian statistics (BEAST, MCMCtree) with relaxed clocks that allow rates to vary between lineages, producing posterior distributions of divergence times with confidence intervals.
The molecular clock hypothesis proposes that DNA sequences accumulate mutations at an approximately constant rate over time. First proposed by Zuckerkandl and Pauling in 1962, it is based on the observation that neutral mutations (not subject to selection) accumulate at a rate approximately equal to the mutation rate μ. In practice, rates vary between lineages (the 'relaxed clock') due to differences in generation time, metabolic rate, population size, and DNA repair efficiency. Modern software handles rate variation explicitly.
Molecular sequence data alone gives only relative divergence times — which split is older or younger. To get absolute times (in years), you need at least one calibration point from the fossil record or a known geological event. Fossils provide minimum age constraints: if a fossil is unambiguously placed on one side of a split, the divergence must predate that fossil. Multiple calibration points across the tree reduce uncertainty and allow cross-validation. Poorly chosen calibrations are the largest source of error in divergence time estimation.
Molecular clock estimates based on whole-genome comparisons, calibrated with fossil hominid data, place the human-chimpanzee divergence at approximately 6–7 million years ago (Mya). The gorilla lineage diverged earlier, at ~8–9 Mya. The earliest known fossils assigned to the human lineage (Sahelanthropus tchadensis) are dated to ~7 Mya from Chad, consistent with molecular estimates. These dates come from multiple independent molecular studies using different calibration approaches, all converging on the 6–7 Mya range for the human-chimp split.