15
/20
—
—
15
/20
—
—
The Norton Scale is the original and one of the most historically significant pressure ulcer risk assessment tools in nursing practice. Developed by Doreen Norton and colleagues in 1962 in the United Kingdom, it was the first validated tool specifically designed to predict pressure sore risk in hospitalized patients, predating both the Braden and Waterlow scales.
The Norton Scale evaluates five domains: physical condition, mental condition, activity, mobility, and incontinence. Each domain is scored from 1 (worst) to 4 (best), yielding a total score from 5 (highest risk) to 20 (lowest risk). Like the Braden Scale, lower scores indicate higher risk. The simplicity of the five-domain, four-level structure makes it one of the quickest pressure ulcer risk assessments to complete.
Pressure ulcers remain a persistent challenge in healthcare, despite decades of attention and prevention efforts. The Norton Scale was developed during Norton's landmark study of geriatric patients, which demonstrated that pressure sore development could be predicted based on measurable patient characteristics and that systematic risk assessment could guide preventive interventions. This was a revolutionary concept at the time.
The critical threshold on the Norton Scale is a score of 14 or below, which indicates the patient is at risk for pressure ulcer development. Scores of 12-14 indicate moderate risk, while scores at or below 10 indicate very high risk. Norton's original research found that patients scoring 14 or below had a significantly higher incidence of pressure sores compared to those scoring above 14.
The mental condition domain is a distinctive feature of the Norton Scale not found in some other assessment tools. Norton recognized that confused, apathetic, or stuporous patients are at increased risk because they cannot perceive or communicate discomfort from sustained pressure, cannot independently reposition, and may resist care interventions. This domain has been validated as an independent risk factor in subsequent research.
While the Braden Scale has largely superseded the Norton Scale in many settings due to its more detailed subscale definitions and stronger evidence base, the Norton Scale remains widely used, particularly in European healthcare systems and in settings where its simplicity and speed of administration are valued. Some modified versions (Norton Plus, Modified Norton Scale) have been developed to address limitations of the original tool.
The Norton Scale sums five domains, each scored 1-4 (lower = higher risk):
Total: 5-20. Risk Level: 1=Low/No risk (15-20), 2=At risk (11-14), 3=High risk (<=10). Prevention needed: 1=Yes (<=14), 0=No (>14).
A Norton score above 14 indicates the patient is not at significant pressure ulcer risk under standard conditions. A score of 11-14 indicates the patient is at risk and requires prevention interventions (regular repositioning, skin inspection, support surfaces). A score of 10 or below indicates very high risk requiring intensive prevention measures. Prevention Needed: 1=Yes (score 14 or below), 0=No.
Inputs
Results
Norton 17/20: Low risk. Alert, mobile, continent. Standard care is sufficient.
Inputs
Results
Norton 8/20: Very high risk. Bed-bound, confused, immobile, with urinary incontinence. Intensive prevention needed.
The Norton Scale is the original pressure ulcer risk assessment tool, developed in 1962. It evaluates five domains (physical condition, mental condition, activity, mobility, incontinence) on a 1-4 scale, with total scores from 5-20.
A score of 14 or below indicates risk for pressure ulcer development. Scores of 10 or below indicate very high risk requiring intensive prevention interventions.
Norton is simpler (5 domains vs 6 subscales) and quicker to complete. Braden has more detailed subscale definitions and stronger evidence for reliability and validity. Both are acceptable for clinical use.
The Norton Scale takes approximately 1-3 minutes to complete, making it one of the fastest pressure ulcer risk assessments available. This is an advantage in busy clinical settings.
The Norton Scale was originally developed for elderly hospitalized patients. It has been studied in other populations but may be less accurate in younger patients, surgical patients, or ICU patients where the Braden Scale may be more appropriate.
Several modified versions exist that add domains (such as food/fluid intake) or provide more detailed scoring criteria. The Modified Norton Plus scale is commonly used in Scandinavian countries.
Confused or stuporous patients cannot feel or report pressure-related discomfort, cannot independently reposition themselves, and may resist repositioning by caregivers. Mental status is an independent risk factor for pressure ulcer development.
No, the Norton Scale should be completed by a trained healthcare professional based on clinical assessment and observation. It requires clinical judgment for accurate scoring.
Assessment should occur on admission, at regular intervals (daily in acute care, weekly in long-term care), and whenever the patient's condition changes significantly.
Incontinence itself does not directly cause pressure ulcers, but moisture from urine and feces macerates the skin, reduces its resistance to pressure and shear, and increases the risk of skin breakdown.
Roboculator Team
The Roboculator Team explains calculations, planning tools, and practical formulas in clear language for real-life situations.
How helpful was this calculator?
Be the first to rate!
Karnofsky Performance Status
Health Risk Assessment & Quality of Life
ECOG Performance Status
Health Risk Assessment & Quality of Life
Katz Index of Independence in ADL
Health Risk Assessment & Quality of Life
Lawton-Brody IADL Scale
Health Risk Assessment & Quality of Life
Falls Risk Calculator
Health Risk Assessment & Quality of Life
Morse Fall Scale
Health Risk Assessment & Quality of Life