0
/13
0
0
0
-2
0
/3
7
0
0
/13
0
0
0
-2
0
/3
7
0
The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is a validated self-report screening instrument designed to identify individuals who may have bipolar spectrum disorders. Developed by Robert Hirschfeld and colleagues in 2000, the MDQ was created to address the significant diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis that characterizes bipolar disorder, where patients typically wait an average of 5-10 years from symptom onset to receiving a correct diagnosis.
Bipolar disorder affects approximately 2.8% of the U.S. adult population and 46 million people worldwide. It encompasses a spectrum of conditions including bipolar I disorder (characterized by manic episodes), bipolar II disorder (characterized by hypomanic and depressive episodes), and cyclothymic disorder. The depressive episodes that dominate the clinical presentation often lead to misdiagnosis as unipolar major depression, resulting in inappropriate treatment that can worsen outcomes.
The MDQ consists of three components: 13 yes/no questions derived from DSM-IV criteria for mania and hypomania, a question about whether symptoms occurred concurrently, and a question about the degree of functional impairment caused by the symptoms. The 13 symptom questions assess elevated mood, irritability, increased self-confidence, decreased need for sleep, pressured speech, racing thoughts, distractibility, increased energy, increased activity, increased sociability, hypersexuality, risk-taking behavior, and excessive spending.
The standard positive screen criteria require: (1) at least 7 of 13 symptom items endorsed, (2) symptoms occurring during the same time period, and (3) moderate or serious functional impairment. Using these criteria, the original validation study in a psychiatric outpatient setting reported sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 90% for bipolar spectrum disorders, with an overall diagnostic efficiency of 85%.
However, subsequent validation studies in community and primary care settings have shown lower sensitivity (28-58%) when using the standard criteria, though specificity remains high (85-97%). This variation highlights the MDQ's limitation as a screening tool that should prompt further clinical evaluation rather than serve as a diagnostic instrument. Some researchers have proposed modified cutoff criteria (e.g., 5 symptoms instead of 7) to improve sensitivity in non-psychiatric settings.
The MDQ has been translated into over 20 languages and is endorsed by multiple clinical guidelines for bipolar disorder screening. The American Psychiatric Association and the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) recommend its use in primary care and psychiatric settings for screening individuals presenting with depression, mood instability, or treatment-resistant depression.
Clinical utility extends beyond initial screening. The MDQ can help identify bipolar disorder in patients currently diagnosed with unipolar depression who have failed to respond to antidepressant monotherapy, patients with recurrent depression, those with a family history of bipolar disorder, and individuals with substance use disorders (which co-occur in approximately 40-60% of bipolar patients).
This calculator implements the standard MDQ scoring algorithm with the three-component positive screen criteria, providing clinicians with a validated tool for bipolar disorder screening in clinical practice.
The MDQ has three parts: (1) 13 yes/no symptom questions scored 0-1 each (total 0-13), (2) a concurrence question (did symptoms co-occur), and (3) an impairment question (0-3 severity). A positive screen requires ALL three criteria: 7+ symptoms endorsed, symptoms occurring concurrently (yes), AND moderate or serious impairment (score 2-3). This three-gate approach maximizes specificity.
Positive Screen (7+ symptoms, concurrent, moderate+ impairment): Significant concern for bipolar spectrum disorder; comprehensive psychiatric evaluation recommended including mood charting, family history, and DSM-5 criteria assessment. Negative Screen: Bipolar disorder less likely but not excluded; consider re-screening if treatment-resistant depression, mood instability, or family history of bipolar disorder. Symptom count alone (without concurrence/impairment) may still warrant clinical attention if high.
Inputs
Results
5 symptoms with only minor impairment: below all three thresholds for positive screen.
Inputs
Results
10 symptoms, concurrent, serious impairment: all three criteria met; psychiatric evaluation indicated.
The MDQ is a self-report screening tool for bipolar spectrum disorders developed by Hirschfeld et al. in 2000. It consists of 13 symptom questions based on DSM criteria for mania/hypomania, a concurrence question, and an impairment question. A positive screen requires meeting all three criteria simultaneously.
A positive screen requires: (1) endorsing 7 or more of the 13 symptom items, (2) confirming that several symptoms occurred during the same time period, AND (3) reporting moderate or serious functional impairment. All three criteria must be met simultaneously.
In psychiatric settings, sensitivity is approximately 73% and specificity 90%. In community/primary care settings, sensitivity drops to 28-58% while specificity remains high at 85-97%. This means a positive screen is quite reliable, but a negative screen does not rule out bipolar disorder.
No. The MDQ screens for bipolar spectrum disorders broadly and cannot differentiate between bipolar I, bipolar II, or cyclothymic disorder. Symptom severity and duration criteria needed for this distinction require comprehensive clinical assessment with mood charting and longitudinal history.
Patients with bipolar disorder spend approximately 3 times more time depressed than manic/hypomanic, and typically seek treatment during depressive episodes. Without specific screening for mania/hypomania, clinicians may diagnose unipolar depression. The average delay from onset to correct diagnosis is 5-10 years.
Screening is particularly recommended for: patients with treatment-resistant depression, recurrent depression (3+ episodes), early-onset depression (before age 25), depression with psychotic features, family history of bipolar disorder, and patients who develop mania/hypomania on antidepressants.
A positive screen should prompt comprehensive psychiatric evaluation including: structured diagnostic interview (e.g., SCID or MINI), detailed longitudinal mood history, family history assessment, substance use evaluation, and consideration of DSM-5 criteria. The MDQ screen alone is insufficient for diagnosis.
The MDQ has been translated and validated in over 20 languages with generally consistent performance. However, sensitivity may vary across cultural contexts due to differences in symptom reporting patterns and help-seeking behavior. Cultural adaptation and local validation are recommended before clinical use in new populations.
Yes. Substance use (particularly stimulants, alcohol, and cannabis) can produce symptoms mimicking mania/hypomania, potentially leading to false-positive screens. Clinical evaluation following a positive screen must carefully assess substance use history and determine whether symptoms occur independently of substance use.
Alternatives include the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32, more sensitive for bipolar II), the Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale (BSDS, better for soft bipolar features), and the TEMPS-A temperament assessment. The MDQ remains the most widely used due to brevity and extensive validation data.
Roboculator Team
The Roboculator Team explains calculations, planning tools, and practical formulas in clear language for real-life situations.
How helpful was this calculator?
Be the first to rate!
CAGE Questionnaire (Alcohol)
Psychiatric Assessment Tools
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence
Psychiatric Assessment Tools
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Psychiatric Assessment Tools
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
Psychiatric Assessment Tools
PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale)
Psychiatric Assessment Tools
AUDIT-C (Alcohol Use Disorders)
Psychiatric Assessment Tools