Roboculator
Online CalculatorsCategoriesDate & EventsNews
Get Started
Online CalculatorsCategoriesDate & EventsNewsGet Started
Roboculator

Smart calculators for every challenge. Free, fast, and private.

Categories

  • Finance
  • Health
  • Math
  • Construction
  • Conversion
  • Everyday Life

Popular Tools

  • Date & Events
  • Loan Calculator
  • BMI Calculator
  • Percentage Calc
  • Latest News
  • Search All

Resources

  • Glossary
  • Topic Tags
  • News & Insights

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 Roboculator. All rights reserved.
Roboculator

roboculator.com

  1. Home
  2. /Health
  3. /Ideal Weight & Body Measurements
  4. /Ideal Weight Calculator

Ideal Weight Calculator

Calculator

Results

Devine Weight

65.9

kg

Robinson Weight

65.2

kg

Miller Weight

66

kg

Hamwi Weight

66.7

kg

Average Ideal Weight

65.9

kg

Healthy BMI Minimum

53.5

kg

Healthy BMI Maximum

72

kg

Results

Devine Weight

65.9

kg

Robinson Weight

65.2

kg

Miller Weight

66

kg

Hamwi Weight

66.7

kg

Average Ideal Weight

65.9

kg

Healthy BMI Minimum

53.5

kg

Healthy BMI Maximum

72

kg

Determining your ideal body weight is a fundamental step toward understanding your health and setting realistic fitness goals. The concept of ideal weight has been studied for over a century, with multiple evidence-based formulas developed by physicians and researchers to estimate the weight that is most strongly associated with longevity and minimal disease risk for a given height. Unlike arbitrary beauty standards, medically-derived ideal weight formulas are grounded in epidemiological data linking body weight to health outcomes.

This Ideal Weight Calculator applies four of the most widely used clinical formulas simultaneously: the Devine formula (1974), the Robinson formula (1983), the Miller formula (1983), and the Hamwi formula (1964). Each formula was derived from different population samples and clinical contexts, which is why they produce slightly different results. By presenting all four alongside their average, this tool gives you a well-rounded estimate rather than relying on a single formula that may not suit your body type.

The Devine formula is the most commonly cited in pharmacological dosing and clinical practice, originally developed for drug dosage calculations. The Robinson formula was created as a refinement of the Devine formula using actuarial data from the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. The Miller formula tends to give slightly higher ideal weights, reflecting data from broader population studies. The Hamwi formula, the oldest of the four, was developed for quick clinical estimates and is still widely used in dietetics practice. All four formulas use height as the primary variable and account for gender differences in body composition.

It is important to understand that ideal weight is a range, not a single number. Individual variation in bone density, muscle mass, body frame size, and genetic factors means that two people of the same height and gender may have different truly optimal weights. These formulas provide a scientifically-grounded starting point, but they should be interpreted alongside other measurements such as body fat percentage, waist circumference, and overall fitness level. People with larger frames or greater muscle mass may have ideal weights above the formula estimates, while those with smaller frames may fall below.

Our calculator supports both metric and imperial units. Enter your height and gender to instantly see results from all four formulas plus their average. Use this information as a guide for setting health goals, discussing weight management with your healthcare provider, or benchmarking your current weight against clinical standards. Remember that the best weight for you is one at which you feel energetic, healthy, and able to maintain an active lifestyle.

Visual Analysis

How It Works

All four formulas estimate ideal body weight based on height above 5 feet (60 inches). The general form is: IBW = base weight + (increment x inches over 60). Devine (1974): Male = 50 + 2.3 per inch over 60, Female = 45.5 + 2.3. Robinson (1983): Male = 52 + 1.9, Female = 49 + 1.7. Miller (1983): Male = 56.2 + 1.41, Female = 53.1 + 1.36. Hamwi (1964): Male = 48 + 2.7, Female = 45.5 + 2.2. All results are in kilograms. The calculator converts metric height to inches internally.

Understanding Your Results

The four formulas will give slightly different results. Focus on the average as a central estimate, and treat the range between the lowest and highest as your ideal weight zone. If your current weight is within 10% of the average, you are generally in a healthy range. Differences between formulas highlight the inherent uncertainty in defining a single ideal weight. Consult your doctor for personalized targets that account for your body frame, muscle mass, and health history.

Worked Examples

Male, 175 cm

Inputs

gendermale
height175
unit systemmetric

Results

devine71.5
robinson68.4
miller68.3
hamwi73.9
average70.5

A 175 cm male has an average ideal weight of ~70.5 kg across all four formulas.

Female, 163 cm

Inputs

genderfemale
height163
unit systemmetric

Results

devine56.6
robinson57.2
miller59.5
hamwi55
average57.1

A 163 cm female has an average ideal weight of ~57.1 kg across all four formulas.

Frequently Asked Questions

No single formula is universally most accurate. The Devine formula is the most widely used in clinical settings, but the Robinson and Miller formulas may better suit certain populations. Using the average of all four formulas provides the most balanced estimate.

Each formula was developed using different population data, time periods, and methodologies. Devine used clinical drug dosing data, Robinson used insurance actuarial tables, Miller used broader population studies, and Hamwi used clinical observation. These different sources naturally produce different estimates.

Ideal weight formulas give a single target, while healthy weight is a range (typically corresponding to BMI 18.5-24.9). You can be healthy at weights above or below the ideal weight estimate, as long as your body composition and other health markers are in good range.

No, the classic ideal weight formulas do not include age as a variable. As people age, body composition changes with potential muscle loss and fat gain. Older adults may benefit from slightly higher ideal weights to maintain reserves during illness.

Athletes, especially those with high muscle mass, often exceed formula-based ideal weights while being in excellent health. These formulas are more appropriate for the general population. Athletes should rely more on body fat percentage and performance metrics.

People with larger bone structures naturally weigh more. A common adjustment is plus/minus 10% for large/small frames. Our Body Frame Size Calculator can help you determine your frame size using wrist circumference.

These formulas were designed for adults 5 feet and taller. For people shorter than 5 feet (152 cm), BMI-based methods or consultation with a healthcare provider are more appropriate than these linear formulas.

The calculator supports both metric (centimeters/kilograms) and imperial (inches/pounds) units. Results are always displayed in kilograms. The internal calculation converts all heights to inches before applying the formulas.

For a rough estimate, an average-frame male should weigh about 48-56 kg at 152 cm plus 1.4-2.7 kg per additional inch of height. For females, start at 45.5-53 kg at 152 cm plus 1.4-2.3 kg per inch. Use this calculator for precise results from all four formulas.

Yes, all four formulas use different base weights and increments for men and women, reflecting the physiological differences in muscle mass, bone density, and fat distribution between sexes. Men typically have higher ideal weights than women of the same height.

Sources & Methodology

Devine BJ. Gentamicin therapy. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1974;8:650-655. Robinson JD et al. Determination of ideal body weight for drug dosage calculations. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1983;40(6):1016-1019. Miller DR et al. Predicting ideal body weight. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1983;40(7):1241-1244. Hamwi GJ. Therapy: changing dietary concepts. In: Danowski TS, ed. Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnosis and Treatment. 1964.
R

Roboculator Team

The Roboculator Team explains calculations, planning tools, and practical formulas in clear language for real-life situations.

How helpful was this calculator?

Be the first to rate!

Related Calculators

Ideal Body Weight (Devine Formula)

Ideal Weight & Body Measurements

Ideal Body Weight (Robinson Formula)

Ideal Weight & Body Measurements

Ideal Body Weight (Miller Formula)

Ideal Weight & Body Measurements

Waist-to-Hip Ratio Calculator

Ideal Weight & Body Measurements

Waist-to-Height Ratio Calculator

Ideal Weight & Body Measurements

Ponderal Index Calculator

Ideal Weight & Body Measurements