Roboculator
Online CalculatorsCategoriesDate & EventsNews
Get Started
Online CalculatorsCategoriesDate & EventsNewsGet Started
Roboculator

Smart calculators for every challenge. Free, fast, and private.

Categories

  • Finance
  • Health
  • Math
  • Construction
  • Conversion
  • Everyday Life

Popular Tools

  • Date & Events
  • Loan Calculator
  • BMI Calculator
  • Percentage Calc
  • Latest News
  • Search All

Resources

  • Glossary
  • Topic Tags
  • News & Insights

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 Roboculator. All rights reserved.
Roboculator

roboculator.com

  1. Home
  2. /Health
  3. /Neurology Calculators
  4. /FOUR Score

FOUR Score

Calculator

Results

FOUR Score Total

16

points

Maximum Possible Score

16

points

Percent of Maximum

100

%

Severity Band

1

Low Score Flag

0

Very Low Score Flag

0

Results

FOUR Score Total

16

points

Maximum Possible Score

16

points

Percent of Maximum

100

%

Severity Band

1

Low Score Flag

0

Very Low Score Flag

0

The FOUR Score (Full Outline of UnResponsiveness) is a modern clinical scale for assessing the level of consciousness that was developed by Dr. Eelco Wijdicks and colleagues at the Mayo Clinic in 2005 to address key limitations of the traditional Glasgow Coma Scale. The FOUR Score evaluates four components — Eye response, Motor response, Brainstem reflexes, and Respiration — each scored from 0 to 4, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 16.

The FOUR Score offers several significant advantages over the GCS. Most importantly, it can be used in intubated patients because it does not include a verbal component — a major limitation of the GCS in ICU settings where many patients are mechanically ventilated. Additionally, it incorporates brainstem reflex testing (pupillary light reflex, corneal reflex) and respiratory patterns, providing crucial information about brain function that the GCS does not capture. These components help detect early signs of brainstem herniation and can differentiate between various levels of severe coma.

The FOUR Score has been validated in multiple clinical settings including neuroscience ICUs, medical ICUs, surgical ICUs, and emergency departments. Studies have demonstrated that it has comparable or superior predictive accuracy for in-hospital mortality and functional outcomes compared to the GCS, with the additional advantage of detecting locked-in syndrome and vegetative states that may score identically on the GCS. A FOUR Score of 0 (all components at zero) suggests loss of all brainstem function and may prompt evaluation for brain death.

This calculator enables standardized FOUR Score assessment at the bedside, particularly valuable in intensive care settings where intubated patients cannot be fully assessed with the traditional GCS. It supports clinical decision-making regarding level of care, prognostication, and identification of patients who may need brain death evaluation.

Visual Analysis

How It Works

The FOUR Score evaluates four components, each scored 0–4:

Eye Response (E): 0 = Eyelids remain closed with pain; 1 = Eyelids closed, open to pain; 2 = Eyelids closed, open to loud voice; 3 = Eyelids open, not tracking; 4 = Eyelids open, tracking or blinks to command

Motor Response (M): 0 = No response or generalized myoclonus status; 1 = Extension; 2 = Flexion; 3 = Localizing to pain; 4 = Thumbs-up, fist, or peace sign to command

Brainstem Reflexes (B): 0 = Absent pupil, corneal, and cough reflexes; 1 = Pupil and corneal reflexes both absent; 2 = Pupil or corneal reflex absent; 3 = One pupil wide and fixed; 4 = Pupil and corneal reflexes present

Respiration (R): 0 = Breathes at ventilator rate or apnea; 1 = Breathes above ventilator rate; 2 = Not intubated, irregular breathing; 3 = Cheyne-Stokes breathing; 4 = Regular breathing

Total = E + M + B + R (range 0–16).

Understanding Your Results

A FOUR Score of 16 indicates full consciousness with intact brainstem function and normal respiration. Scores of 12–15 suggest moderate impairment but preserved brainstem reflexes. Scores of 7–11 indicate significant neurological compromise. Scores of 1–6 indicate severe impairment with likely brainstem dysfunction. A score of 0 suggests absent brainstem function and should prompt evaluation for brain death when appropriate.

Worked Examples

Intubated, Following Commands

Inputs

eye4
motor4
brainstem4
respiration1

Results

score13
prognosis1

FOUR Score 13 — patient intubated but alert, following commands, intact brainstem reflexes.

Deep Coma

Inputs

eye0
motor1
brainstem1
respiration0

Results

score2
prognosis3

FOUR Score 2 — deep coma with minimal brainstem function, breathing at ventilator rate.

Frequently Asked Questions

FOUR stands for Full Outline of UnResponsiveness. It is a 4-component coma scale (Eye, Motor, Brainstem, Respiration) with each component scored 0–4, totaling 0–16 points.

The FOUR Score replaces the verbal component (unusable in intubated patients) with brainstem reflex and respiration assessments, making it applicable in ICU settings. It also better detects locked-in syndrome and brainstem herniation.

Yes, this is one of its primary advantages. Unlike the GCS, which cannot score the verbal component in intubated patients, all FOUR Score components can be assessed regardless of intubation status.

A FOUR Score of 0 indicates absent eye response, motor response, brainstem reflexes, and respiratory drive — all four components at zero. This suggests absent brainstem function and may warrant brain death evaluation.

Yes. Locked-in syndrome patients may score low on GCS due to inability to speak or move, but the FOUR Score can detect eye tracking (E4) and preserved brainstem reflexes, distinguishing it from coma.

Studies show excellent inter-rater reliability for the FOUR Score, comparable to or better than the GCS, across different types of healthcare providers including nurses, residents, and attending physicians.

Multiple studies show the FOUR Score has comparable or slightly superior predictive accuracy for mortality and functional outcomes compared to GCS, with the added advantage of applicability in intubated patients.

The FOUR Score tests the pupillary light reflex, corneal reflex, and cough reflex. These reflexes test the function of cranial nerves II, III, V, VII, IX, and X, providing comprehensive brainstem assessment.

Breathing at the ventilator rate or apnea scores 0; breathing above ventilator rate scores 1; irregular breathing scores 2; Cheyne-Stokes pattern scores 3; regular breathing pattern scores 4.

The FOUR Score is increasingly recommended as a complement or alternative to GCS, particularly in ICU settings. However, GCS remains the most widely known scale, and many protocols and guidelines still reference it.

Sources & Methodology

Wijdicks EFM et al. Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(4):585-593; Iyer VN et al. Validity of the FOUR score coma scale in the medical intensive care unit. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(8):694-701; Wijdicks EFM. The FOUR score. In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2017;140:339-352.
R

Roboculator Team

The Roboculator Team explains calculations, planning tools, and practical formulas in clear language for real-life situations.

How helpful was this calculator?

Be the first to rate!

Related Calculators

NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

Neurology Calculators

Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)

Neurology Calculators

Pediatric GCS Calculator

Neurology Calculators

Hunt and Hess Scale (SAH)

Neurology Calculators

DRAGON Score (Post-Thrombolysis)

Neurology Calculators

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

Neurology Calculators