The APACHE II Score Calculator computes the ICU severity score from acute physiology points, age points, and chronic health points. A validated tool predicting in-hospital mortality — used for patient stratification, clinical trial enrollment, and comparing ICU performance across institutions.
10
0
pts
0
pts
10
0
pts
0
pts
How critically ill is this patient, and what is the risk of dying during this ICU admission? The APACHE II score has been answering that question in intensive care units worldwide since Knaus et al. published it in 1985. The calculator for APACHE II takes the three component scores and computes the total, which maps to a predicted in-hospital mortality probability via a validated logistic regression equation.
The APACHE II score (maximum 71 points) consists of three components:
Use this online calculator once the APS, age, and chronic health components are calculated. The SOFA score calculator provides the alternative severity assessment preferred in current sepsis guidelines.
In Knaus et al. (1985), the predicted in-hospital mortality R is derived from the logistic regression:
ln(R/(1−R)) = −3.517 + (APACHE II score × 0.146) + diagnostic category weight
Mortality by approximate score range (without diagnostic category adjustment):
APACHE II was validated on an ICU population from the mid-1980s — before widespread use of lung-protective ventilation, modern vasopressors, and evidence-based sepsis protocols. Predicted mortality from the original equation systematically overestimates mortality in modern ICUs. Contemporary use should compare APACHE II-predicted vs. observed mortality as a performance benchmark rather than as an individual patient prognosis tool. For individual patients, APACHE II should inform clinical decision-making alongside bedside assessment, not replace it. The qSOFA calculator provides a simpler 3-variable score for rapid sepsis risk stratification outside the ICU. The sepsis and critical care calculators cover the full suite of ICU severity scoring tools.
APACHE III (1991) and APACHE IV (2006) added variables, expanded the diagnostic category list, and recalibrated mortality predictions against larger modern datasets. APACHE III adds arterial blood urea nitrogen, serum albumin, bilirubin, blood glucose, and urine output, achieving better discrimination (AUROC ≈ 0.88) than APACHE II (AUROC ≈ 0.84). APACHE IV further improved calibration using contemporary ICU populations. Despite these advances, APACHE II remains the most widely cited version in published research due to its 40-year literature base, enabling cross-study comparison of patient severity across decades of critical care research.
APACHE II = Acute Physiology Score (APS, 0-60, from 12 physiological variables) + Age Points (0-6) + Chronic Health Points (0-5). Total range: 0-71. Higher scores indicate greater illness severity and higher predicted mortality.
0-4: ~4% mortality. 5-9: ~8%. 10-14: ~15%. 15-19: ~25%. 20-24: ~40%. 25-29: ~55%. 30-34: ~73%. 35+: >80%. Use for risk stratification, not individual prognosis.
Inputs
Results
APS 6, young, no chronic disease: APACHE II = 6, ~8% predicted mortality.
Inputs
Results
APS 22, age 65-74, emergency with chronic disease: APACHE II = 32, ~73% predicted mortality.
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II: a severity-of-illness scoring system using physiological, age, and chronic health data from the first 24 hours of ICU admission.
Acute Physiology Score (12 variables, 0-60), age points (0-6), and chronic health points (0 or 2 or 5).
Temperature, MAP, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygenation, pH, sodium, potassium, creatinine, hematocrit, WBC, and GCS.
71 (APS 60 + age 6 + chronic 5), though scores above 40 are rare.
Using the worst values from the first 24 hours of ICU admission. It is a point-in-time assessment.
APACHE II provides population-level estimates. Individual outcomes may vary significantly from predicted mortality.
Severe organ insufficiency of liver, cardiovascular, respiratory, or renal systems, or immunocompromised state, documented prior to admission.
APACHE IV (2006) uses more variables, disease-specific equations, and updated coefficients for better calibration with modern ICU care.
It was designed for admission assessment. Daily recalculation is possible but SOFA is preferred for serial monitoring.
William Knaus and colleagues, published in Critical Care Medicine in 1985.
How helpful was this calculator?
5.0/5 (1 rating)